[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707111258020.3575@east.gentwo.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:58:41 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
len.brown@...el.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
yang.zhang.wz@...il.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle
periods
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > @@ -787,6 +787,7 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts,
> > if (!ts->tick_stopped) {
> > calc_load_nohz_start();
> > cpu_load_update_nohz_start();
> > + quiet_vmstat();
>
> This patch seems to make sense. Christoph?
Ok makes sense to me too. Was never entirely sure where the proper place
would be to call it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists