[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hk23evm9a.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:53:05 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: defer dev_pm_domain_set() until genpd->attach_dev succeeds if present
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>> If the genpd->attach_dev or genpd->power_on fails, genpd_dev_pm_attach
>> may return -EPROBE_DEFER initially. However genpd_alloc_dev_data sets
>> the PM domain for the device unconditionally.
>>
>> When subsequent attempts are made to call genpd_dev_pm_attach, it may
>> return -EEXISTS checking dev->pm_domain without re-attempting to call
>> attach_dev or power_on.
>>
>> platform_drv_probe then attempts to call drv->probe as the return value
>> -EEXIST != -EPROBE_DEFER, which may end up in a situation where the
>> device is accessed without it's power domain switched on.
>>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>
> Ulf, this looks like a genuine fix to me, any comments?
>
This looks like the right fix to me.
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists