lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2017 03:19:56 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c: don't apply the lahf_lm workaround in
 a hypervisor

When I start a virtual machine, kvm complains about accesses to an unknown
MSR ("vcpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0xc001100d"). This is caused by the code in
init_amd_k8 that tries to work around a BIOS bug that incorrectly sets
lahf_lm.

This patch disables this workaround when running in a hypervisor.

Note that the processors for which this erratum applies do not support
virtualization at all, so if we are running in a hypervisor, we can be
sure that the workaronud doesn't apply.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -627,8 +627,12 @@ static void init_amd_k8(struct cpuinfo_x
 	 * Some BIOSes incorrectly force this feature, but only K8 revision D
 	 * (model = 0x14) and later actually support it.
 	 * (AMD Erratum #110, docId: 25759).
+	 *
+	 * Don't apply this workaround in a virtual machine because kvm
+	 * complains about reads from an unknown MSR.
 	 */
-	if (c->x86_model < 0x14 && cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_LAHF_LM)) {
+	if (c->x86_model < 0x14 && cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_LAHF_LM) &&
+	    !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR)) {
 		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_LAHF_LM);
 		if (!rdmsrl_amd_safe(0xc001100d, &value)) {
 			value &= ~BIT_64(32);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ