lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:04:41 +0200
From:   Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
To:     benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org
Cc:     linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 21/22] rtc: test: stop using rtc deprecated functions

rtc_time_to_tm() and rtc_tm_to_time() are deprecated because they
rely on 32bits variables and that will make rtc break in y2038/2016.
Stop using those two functions to safer 64bits ones.

For the same reasons use set_mmss64 callback instead of set_mmss
Since only set_mmss64 be will used remove module parameter.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
CC: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
CC: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
CC: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-test.c | 17 +----------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-test.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-test.c
index 3a2da4c..6a460e3 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-test.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-test.c
@@ -13,10 +13,6 @@
 #include <linux/rtc.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
-static int test_mmss64;
-module_param(test_mmss64, int, 0644);
-MODULE_PARM_DESC(test_mmss64, "Test struct rtc_class_ops.set_mmss64().");
-
 static struct platform_device *test0 = NULL, *test1 = NULL;
 
 static int test_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev,
@@ -44,12 +40,6 @@ static int test_rtc_set_mmss64(struct device *dev, time64_t secs)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int test_rtc_set_mmss(struct device *dev, unsigned long secs)
-{
-	dev_info(dev, "%s, secs = %lu\n", __func__, secs);
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int test_rtc_proc(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq)
 {
 	struct platform_device *plat_dev = to_platform_device(dev);
@@ -70,7 +60,7 @@ static int test_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enable)
 	.read_time = test_rtc_read_time,
 	.read_alarm = test_rtc_read_alarm,
 	.set_alarm = test_rtc_set_alarm,
-	.set_mmss = test_rtc_set_mmss,
+	.set_mmss64 = test_rtc_set_mmss64,
 	.alarm_irq_enable = test_rtc_alarm_irq_enable,
 };
 
@@ -111,11 +101,6 @@ static int test_probe(struct platform_device *plat_dev)
 	int err;
 	struct rtc_device *rtc;
 
-	if (test_mmss64) {
-		test_rtc_ops.set_mmss64 = test_rtc_set_mmss64;
-		test_rtc_ops.set_mmss = NULL;
-	}
-
 	rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&plat_dev->dev, "test",
 				&test_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
 	if (IS_ERR(rtc)) {
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists