lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:30:15 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
Cc:     linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/22] rtc: ds1305: stop using rtc deprecated functions

Well, again, please don't.

I'll be randomly taking this one as an example.

That RTC will fail in 2100, 6 years before rtc_tm_to_time begins to be
an issue.

Once again, your patch hides the fact that there is an issue. There is
no other way than reading the datasheet and actually think about what
your are doing instead of using sed/coccinelle/whatever.

On 12/07/2017 at 10:04:28 +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> rtc_time_to_tm() and rtc_tm_to_time() are deprecated because they
> rely on 32bits variables and that will make rtc break in y2038/2016.
> Stop using those two functions to safer 64bits ones.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
> CC: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
> CC: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> CC: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c | 11 ++++-------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
> index 72b2293..b41168b 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
> @@ -324,23 +324,20 @@ static int ds1305_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm)
>  {
>  	struct ds1305	*ds1305 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct spi_device *spi = ds1305->spi;
> -	unsigned long	now, later;
> +	unsigned long long now, later;
>  	struct rtc_time	tm;
>  	int		status;
>  	u8		buf[1 + DS1305_ALM_LEN];
>  
>  	/* convert desired alarm to time_t */
> -	status = rtc_tm_to_time(&alm->time, &later);
> -	if (status < 0)
> -		return status;
> +	later = rtc_tm_to_time64(&alm->time);
>  
>  	/* Read current time as time_t */
>  	status = ds1305_get_time(dev, &tm);
>  	if (status < 0)
>  		return status;
> -	status = rtc_tm_to_time(&tm, &now);
> -	if (status < 0)
> -		return status;
> +
> +	now = rtc_tm_to_time64(&tm);
>  
>  	/* make sure alarm fires within the next 24 hours */
>  	if (later <= now)
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ