[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1499848600-7233-3-git-send-email-p.rosenberger@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:36:40 +0200
From: Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...utronix.de>
To: linus.walleij@...aro.org, gnurou@...il.com,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de,
Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: gpio-mxc: gpio_set_wake_irq() use proper return values
Errors from enable_irq_wake() in gpio_set_wake_irq() were silently ignored.
Thus led to the problem that gpio_set_wake_irq() always returned
successfully, even if enable_irq_wake() returned an error.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...utronix.de>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
index 9269225..3dcd990 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
@@ -324,20 +324,21 @@ static int gpio_set_wake_irq(struct irq_data *d, u32 enable)
struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct mxc_gpio_port *port = gc->private;
u32 gpio_idx = d->hwirq;
+ int ret;
if (enable) {
if (port->irq_high && (gpio_idx >= 16))
- enable_irq_wake(port->irq_high);
+ ret = enable_irq_wake(port->irq_high);
else
- enable_irq_wake(port->irq);
+ ret = enable_irq_wake(port->irq);
} else {
if (port->irq_high && (gpio_idx >= 16))
- disable_irq_wake(port->irq_high);
+ ret = disable_irq_wake(port->irq_high);
else
- disable_irq_wake(port->irq);
+ ret = disable_irq_wake(port->irq);
}
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
static int mxc_gpio_init_gc(struct mxc_gpio_port *port, int irq_base)
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists