linux-kernel - Re: [regression drm/noveau] suspend to ram -> BOOM: exception RIP: drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKb7UvhMzbMKFMFP1UvbrTC0Un4F2u5_mv5VWrkizRxo_AbN4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:37:56 -0400
From:   Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>
To:     Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [regression drm/noveau] suspend to ram -> BOOM: exception RIP: drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos+335

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 11:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:22 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> >
>> > Some display stuff did change for 4.13 for GM20x+ boards. If it's not
>> > too much trouble, a bisect would be pretty useful.
>>
>> Bisection seemingly went fine, but the result is odd.
>>
>> e98c58e55f68f8785aebfab1f8c9a03d8de0afe1 is the first bad commit
>
> But it really really is bad.  Looking at gitk fork in the road leading
> to it...
>
> 52d9d38c183b drm/sti:fix spelling mistake: "compoment" -> "component" - good
> e4e818cc2d7c drm: make drm_panel.h self-contained                     - good
> 9cf8f5802f39 drm: add missing declaration to drm_blend.h              - good
>
> Before the git highway splits, all is well.  The lane with commits
> works fine at both ends, but e98c58e55f68 is busted.  Merge arfifact?

Hmmm... that tree does not appear to have gotten a v4.12 backmerge at
any point. The last backmerge from Linus as far as I can tell was
v4.11-rc7. Could be an interaction with some out-of-tree change.