[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170712175357.GA32609@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:53:57 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Stefan Berger <StefanBergerstefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
lkp@...org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tycho@...ker.com, serge@...lyn.com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
christian.brauner@...lbox.org, amir73il@...il.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xattr: Enable security.capability in user namespaces
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:05:11AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
[..]
> @@ -301,14 +721,39 @@ ssize_t
> __vfs_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> void *value, size_t size)
> {
> - const struct xattr_handler *handler;
> + const struct xattr_handler *handler = NULL;
> + char *newname = NULL;
> + int ret, userns_supt_xattr;
> + struct user_namespace *userns = current_user_ns();
> +
> + userns_supt_xattr = (xattr_is_userns_supported(name, false) >= 0);
> +
Hi Stephan,
> + do {
> + kfree(newname);
> +
> + newname = xattr_userns_name(name, userns);
^^^
Will name be pointing to a freed string in second iteration of loop.
> + if (IS_ERR(newname))
> + return PTR_ERR(newname);
> +
> + if (!handler) {
> + name = newname;
Here we assign name and at the beginning of second iteration we free
newname.
Also I am not sure why do we do this assignment only if handler is NULL.
BTW, I set cap_sys_admin on a file outside usernamespace and then launched
user namespace (mapping 1000 to 0). And then tried to do getcap on file
and I am not seeing security.capability set by host. Not sure what am I
doing wrong. getxattr() seems to return -ENODATA. Still debugging it.
Also, have we resovled the question of stacked filesystem like overlayfs.
There we are switching creds to mounter's creds when doing operations on
underlying filesystem. I am concenrned does that mean, we will get and
return security.capability to caller in usernamespace instead of
security.capability@...=1000.
Vivek
> + handler = xattr_resolve_name(inode, &name);
> + if (IS_ERR(handler)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(handler);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (!handler->get) {
> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> + ret = handler->get(handler, dentry, inode, name, value, size);
> + userns = userns->parent;
> + } while ((ret == -ENODATA) && userns && userns_supt_xattr);
>
> - handler = xattr_resolve_name(inode, &name);
> - if (IS_ERR(handler))
> - return PTR_ERR(handler);
> - if (!handler->get)
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - return handler->get(handler, dentry, inode, name, value, size);
> +out:
> + kfree(newname);
> + return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vfs_getxattr);
>
Thanks
Vivek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists