[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170712185306.GB2393@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:53:06 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
len.brown@...el.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, yang.zhang.wz@...il.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] Create fast idle path for short idle periods
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 07:46:42PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 08:56:51AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Very good, I have queued the patch below. I left out the removal of
> > the export as I need to work out why the export was there. If it turns
> > out not to be needed, I will remove the related ones as well.
>
> 'git grep rcu_idle_enter' shows no callers other than
> kernel/sched/idle.c. Which seems a clear indication its not needed.
>
> You also have to ask yourself, do I want joe module author to ever call
> this. To which I suspect the answer is: hell no ;-)
The other question is "why did I do this in the first place".
The only case where there will turn out to have been a still-valid reason
is if I remove it without checking first. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists