[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170713074243.lvrxjpt7pfksg4xl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:42:43 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] spi: loopback-test: provide loop request option.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:40:20PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>
>
> Provide a module parameter to request internal
> loop by the SPI master controller.
> This should make loop testing easier without extra HW modification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
> index f4875f177df0..34e1544d7d0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,14 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(loopback,
> "is checked to match tx_buf after the spi_message " \
> "is executed");
>
> +/* the device is jumpered for loopback - enabling some rx_buf tests */
> +int loop_req;
> +module_param(loop_req, int, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(loop_req,
> + "if set enable controller will be asked to enable " \
> + "test loop mode. If supported, MISO and MOSI will be " \
> + "jumpered by SPI controller");
> +
> /* run only a specific test */
> int run_only_test = -1;
> module_param(run_only_test, int, 0);
> @@ -313,6 +321,16 @@ static int spi_loopback_test_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + if (loop_req) {
> + spi->mode = SPI_LOOP | spi->mode;
> + ret = spi_setup(spi);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI setup wasn't successful %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI_LOOP is not supported by SPI master.");
Why two error messages here? What about:
dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI setup with SPI_LOOP failed (%d)\n", ret);
These lines are > 80 chars, so you should break them.
> + return -ENODEV;
return ret?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists