[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170713111209.ji6w3trt45icpuf6@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:12:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, walken@...gle.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, kirill@...temov.name,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org, npiggin@...il.com,
kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/16] lockdep: Detect and handle hist_lock ring
buffer overwrite
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:29:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 07:09:53PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:50:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > wait_for_completion(&C);
> > > atomic_inc_return();
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(A1);
> > > mutex_unlock(A1);
> > >
> > >
> > > <IRQ>
> > > spin_lock(B1);
> > > spin_unlock(B1);
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > spin_lock(B64);
> > > spin_unlock(B64);
> > > </IRQ>
> > >
> > >
Also consider the alternative:
<IRQ>
spin_lock(D);
spin_unlock(D);
complete(&C);
</IRQ>
in which case the context test will also not work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists