[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170713122115.p62q7ua6gtuapfep@treble>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:21:15 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] x86: ORC unwinder (previously undwarf)
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 07:17:55AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> BTW, while we're throwing out ideas for this, here's another idea,
> though it's almost certainly not a good one :-)
>
> For user space stack unwinding, the kernel could emulate what the kernel
> 'guess' unwinder does by scanning the user space stack and returning all
> the text addresses it finds.
>
> The results wouldn't be 100% accurate, but they could end up being
> useful over time.
And to expound further on the bad idea, maybe the "bad" addresses could
be filtered out somehow in post-processing (insert lots of hand waving).
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists