linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] crypto: stm32 - CRC use relaxed function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <05aae64aaee08aa97b53179d64be1a76e0d9c182.1499950409.git.lionel.debieve@st.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:06:31 +0200
From:   Lionel Debieve <lionel.debieve@...com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>,
        Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>,
        Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@...com>,
        Lionel Debieve <lionel.debieve@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: stm32 - CRC use relaxed function

In case of arm soc support, readl and writel will
be optimized using relaxed functions

Signed-off-by: Lionel Debieve <lionel.debieve@...com>
Reviewed-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>
---
 drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c b/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c
index ec83b1e..04d2f4b 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c
@@ -107,12 +107,12 @@ static int stm32_crc_init(struct shash_desc *desc)
 	spin_unlock_bh(&crc_list.lock);
 
 	/* Reset, set key, poly and configure in bit reverse mode */
-	writel(bitrev32(mctx->key), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_INIT);
-	writel(bitrev32(mctx->poly), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_POL);
-	writel(CRC_CR_RESET | CRC_CR_REVERSE, ctx->crc->regs + CRC_CR);
+	writel_relaxed(bitrev32(mctx->key), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_INIT);
+	writel_relaxed(bitrev32(mctx->poly), ctx->crc->regs + CRC_POL);
+	writel_relaxed(CRC_CR_RESET | CRC_CR_REVERSE, ctx->crc->regs + CRC_CR);
 
 	/* Store partial result */
-	ctx->partial = readl(ctx->crc->regs + CRC_DR);
+	ctx->partial = readl_relaxed(ctx->crc->regs + CRC_DR);
 	ctx->crc->nb_pending_bytes = 0;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ static int stm32_crc_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *d8,
 
 		if (crc->nb_pending_bytes == sizeof(u32)) {
 			/* Process completed pending data */
-			writel(*(u32 *)crc->pending_data, crc->regs + CRC_DR);
+			writel_relaxed(*(u32 *)crc->pending_data,
+				       crc->regs + CRC_DR);
 			crc->nb_pending_bytes = 0;
 		}
 	}
@@ -143,10 +144,10 @@ static int stm32_crc_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *d8,
 	d32 = (u32 *)d8;
 	for (i = 0; i < length >> 2; i++)
 		/* Process 32 bits data */
-		writel(*(d32++), crc->regs + CRC_DR);
+		writel_relaxed(*(d32++), crc->regs + CRC_DR);
 
 	/* Store partial result */
-	ctx->partial = readl(crc->regs + CRC_DR);
+	ctx->partial = readl_relaxed(crc->regs + CRC_DR);
 
 	/* Check for pending data (non 32 bits) */
 	length &= 3;
-- 
2.7.4