linux-kernel - Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2017 23:41:51 +0200
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.13

On 2017-07-13 23:05, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se> wrote:
>>
>> And if you, like me, sometimes take a peek at the core of several
>> subsystems using emacs, the buffers are either named "core.c<subsys>"
>> or "subsys-core.c". The latter naming is more friendly to tab-completion
>> after ctrl-x b.
> 
> Here's a nickel, Kid. Buy a real editor.

Ahh, thanks for calling me a kid, I think I'll have a shave too.

>    http://i.imgur.com/z96dZ0x.jpg
> 
> If your editor can't show directories, the limitations in your
> environment shouldn't screw over everybody else.

FWIW, I agree that your points made sense. I was just pointing out one
situation were I actually preferred the prefix.

Cheers,
Peter