[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52b24d55-b7d5-2d50-4bb4-3e94d81c1be6@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:29:30 +0530
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: joro@...tes.org, robin.murphy@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, will.deacon@....com,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robdclark@...il.com,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, sricharan@...eaurora.org,
stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org, architt@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between
masters and smmu
On 07/13/2017 04:25 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/06, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> index ddbfa8ab69e6..75567d9698ab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> @@ -1348,6 +1348,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
>> struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
>> struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
>> + struct device_link *link = NULL;
> Unnecessary initialization?
Right, will drop this.
Thanks.
>
>> int i, ret;
>>
>> if (using_legacy_binding) {
>> @@ -1403,6 +1404,16 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>>
>> pm_runtime_put_sync(smmu->dev);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Establish the link between smmu and master, so that the
>> + * smmu gets runtime enabled/disabled as per the master's
>> + * needs.
>> + */
>> + link = device_link_add(dev, smmu->dev, DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME);
>> + if (!link)
>> + dev_warn(smmu->dev, "Unable to create device link between %s and %s\n",
>> + dev_name(smmu->dev), dev_name(dev));
>> +
>> return 0;
>>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists