[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1707131507150.31299@vshiva-Udesk>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, vikas.shivappa@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, andi.kleen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/21] x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Add cpus file support
On Sun, 2 Jul 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> {
>> + struct rdtgroup *pr = rdtgrp->parent, *cr;
>
> *pr and *cr really suck.
We used r before rdtgroup. pr would be parent rdtgrp. Wanted to keep them short
as there are more in this function.
prgrp can be used if thats not ok?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists