linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] RDMA/uverbs: Fix the check for port number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170714064801.GB16816@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2017 08:48:01 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, dledford@...hat.com,
        swise@...ngridcomputing.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, shiraz.saleem@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] RDMA/uverbs: Fix the check for port number

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 02:37:37PM -0500, Mustafa Ismail wrote:
> The port number is only valid if IB_QP_PORT is set in the mask.
> So only check port number if it is valid to prevent modify_qp from
> failing due to an invalid port number.
> 
> Fixes: 5ecce4c9b17b("Check port number supplied by user verbs cmds")
> Signed-off-by: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>