linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: move include files out of include/linux/i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170714075845.GB1498@katana>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:58:45 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: move include files out of include/linux/i2c

Hi peda,

> I don't seem to have this series in my inbox and not in my i2c folder either?

You have been CCed on the patches, but not on the cover-letter. Sorry
about that.

> patchwork and then I found it in the branch too, but in patchwork it has the
> expected "i2c: mux: " prefix so I'm not sure what you are talking about
> *exactly*.

Hmm, looks like I forgot to push out the updated branch. Sorry again.
But it is the same patch which originally got an imperfect prefix from
my automated script.

> But I'm sure you'll do something sensible, just go ahead.

I hope so :) Thanks!

> PS. Please Cc me if you want a faster reaction, I didn't notice this
> yesterday.

Yup, same issue as above. I was wrong in that I assumed you have been on
CC for the cover-letter as well. I should have checked again.

Thanks,

   Wolfram

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)