[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170714082902.jhs2ftaxus2445k6@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:29:02 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] x86: ORC unwinder (previously undwarf)
* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> For user space stack unwinding, the kernel could emulate what the kernel
> 'guess' unwinder does by scanning the user space stack and returning all
> the text addresses it finds.
User-space stacks tend to be much larger than kernel stacks, the cost of doing
such a full scan on every PMI would kill a lot of profiling workloads.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists