lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-0e4097c3354e2f5a5ad8affd9dc7f7f7d00bb6b9@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:10:14 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Wanpeng Li <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     wanpeng.li@...mail.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        riel@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        hpa@...or.com, lcapitulino@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xiaolong.ye@...el.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched/cputime: Don't use smp_processor_id() in
 preemptible context

Commit-ID:  0e4097c3354e2f5a5ad8affd9dc7f7f7d00bb6b9
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/0e4097c3354e2f5a5ad8affd9dc7f7f7d00bb6b9
Author:     Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
AuthorDate: Sun, 9 Jul 2017 00:40:28 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:27:15 +0200

sched/cputime: Don't use smp_processor_id() in preemptible context

Recent kernels trigger this warning:

 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: 99-trinity/181
 caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
 CPU: 0 PID: 181 Comm: 99-trinity Not tainted 4.12.0-01059-g2a42eb9 #1
 Call Trace:
  dump_stack+0x82/0xb8
  check_preemption_disabled()
  debug_smp_processor_id()
  vtime_delta()
  task_cputime()
  thread_group_cputime()
  thread_group_cputime_adjusted()
  wait_consider_task()
  do_wait()
  SYSC_wait4()
  do_syscall_64()
  entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path()

As Frederic pointed out:

| Although those sched_clock_cpu() things seem to only matter when the
| sched_clock() is unstable. And that stability is a condition for nohz_full
| to work anyway. So probably sched_clock() alone would be enough.

This patch fixes it by replacing sched_clock_cpu() with sched_clock() to
avoid calling smp_processor_id() in a preemptible context.

Reported-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1499586028-7402-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com
[ Prettified the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/cputime.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 6e3ea4a..14d2dbf 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static u64 vtime_delta(struct vtime *vtime)
 {
 	unsigned long long clock;
 
-	clock = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
+	clock = sched_clock();
 	if (clock < vtime->starttime)
 		return 0;
 
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ void arch_vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
 
 	write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
 	vtime->state = VTIME_SYS;
-	vtime->starttime = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
+	vtime->starttime = sched_clock();
 	write_seqcount_end(&vtime->seqcount);
 }
 
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ void vtime_init_idle(struct task_struct *t, int cpu)
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
 	vtime->state = VTIME_SYS;
-	vtime->starttime = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+	vtime->starttime = sched_clock();
 	write_seqcount_end(&vtime->seqcount);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ