linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/57] 4.4.77-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:26:36 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/57] 4.4.77-stable review

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:35:24PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:51:20AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 02:07:45PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> > > stable-rc/linux-4.4.y boot: 99 boots: 1 failed, 92 passed with 5 offline, 1 conflict (v4.4.76-58-g1a12e8e8a429)
> 
> > Any idea how 0-day and Guenter's system found problems with this
> > release, but you all didn't?  Do you not have any SH systems in
> > kernelci?
> 
> No, SH is really not at all widely available.  We do boot a few qemu
> things but just for architectures that we're booting physical systems
> with and there's no SH ones.

Ah, ok, fair enough, thanks.

greg k-h