[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdax+tYOsJphnnP7HE-0srhSZshDu+znDYo=092YotANiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:35:46 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: fix pcm-creation regression
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> This reverts commit 99b04f4c4051 ("ASoC: add Component level
> pcm_new/pcm_free"), which started calling the pcm_new callback for every
> component in a *card* when creating a new pcm, something which does not
> seem to make any sense.
>
> This specifically led to memory leaks in systems with more than one
> platform component and where DMA memory is allocated in the
> platform-driver callback. For example, when both mcasp devices are being
> used on an am335x board, DMA memory would be allocated twice for every
> DAI link during probe.
>
> When CONFIG_SND_VERBOSE_PROCFS was set this fortunately also led to
> warnings such as:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 565 at ../fs/proc/generic.c:346 proc_register+0x110/0x154
> proc_dir_entry 'sub0/prealloc' already registered
>
> Since there seems to be no users of the new component callbacks, and the
> current implementation introduced a regression, let's revert the
> offending commit for now.
>
> Fixes: 99b04f4c4051 ("ASoC: add Component level pcm_new/pcm_free")
> Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.10
> Cc: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
> Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
I have repeatedly ran into this bug, thanks a *lot* for fixing it.
It solves a problem not only on this old code but also in my
development tree where I try to move the Ux500 audio to DT-only
instantiation and this was a blocker that I just ran my head into
the last month or two.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists