[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v64KXCm1SzCz1hSkk1WOA03rju5_v_Q9XdF=cSs26Wz+Tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:09:07 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] drm/sun4i: Add if statement instead of depends on
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> The depends on relationship is obvious, and using an if statement will
> propagate it to every option without the need for each and every one of
> them to define it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists