[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31d327dd-bc3d-cb80-45a9-6a8eb9eb2a9d@mni.thm.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:19:02 +0200
From: Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann@....thm.de>
To: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@...il.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [regression drm/noveau] suspend to ram -> BOOM:
exception RIP: drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos+335
The conversion is a nice catch, but i'd like to have a bit more context,
see below!
With a better description:
Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann@....thm.de>
On 7/14/17 5:10 PM, Karol Herbst wrote:
> Yeah, we shouldn't let the machine die. Are there more WARN_ON_ONCE
> usage we could convert to WARN_ONCE?
>
> Reviewed-By: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@...il.com>
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Tobias Klausmann
> <tobias.johannes.klausmann@....thm.de> wrote:
>> On 7/14/17 3:41 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 15:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>>> All DRM did was to slip a
>>>> WARN_ON_ONCE() that nouveau triggers into a kernel module where such
>>>> things no longer warn, they blow the box out of the water.
>>> BTW, turn that irksome WARN_ON_ONCE() in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
>>> into a WARN_ONCE(), and all is peachy, you get the warning, box lives.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
>>> @@ -605,7 +605,8 @@ bool drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutp
>>> */
>>> if (mode->crtc_clock == 0) {
>>> DRM_DEBUG("crtc %u: Noop due to uninitialized mode.\n",
>>> pipe);
>>> - WARN_ON_ONCE(drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev));
>>> + WARN_ONCE(drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev), "%s: report
>>> me.\n",
"report me" seems a bit odd, maybe just uninitialized mode?
>>> + dev->driver->name);
>>> return false;
>>> }
>>
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> confirmed this helps saving the box, but we still have to find the root
>> cause! Backtrace with the above fix applied (and the one which came in with
>> the latest drm-fixes merge)!
>>
>>
>> [1] https://hastebin.com/uyoqifijed.http
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tobias
>> Reviewed-By: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@...il.com>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nouveau mailing list
>> Nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
Powered by blists - more mailing lists