[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1703157.S2GHVxrQk4@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 01:38:04 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@...madesigns.com>,
JB <jb_lescher@...madesigns.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] PM / suspend: Add platform_suspend_target_state()
On Sunday, July 16, 2017 01:34:53 AM Mason wrote:
> On 16/07/2017 01:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, July 15, 2017 10:20:27 AM Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >
> >> The enum offers the advantage of centralizing how many different states
> >> exist for all the platforms we know about in the kernel, it's easy to
> >> define common values for platforms that have the same semantics, just
> >> like it's simple to add new values for platform specific details.
> >
> > Well, you seem to be liking this, so why don't you just implement it?
>
> At the end of his message, Florian wrote:
>
> > In any case, just agree and I will be happy to follow-up with patches.
But it may be hard to convince everybody without posting code changes
and often enough showing a patch makes a good argument.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists