[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170715012538.10101-34-alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 01:26:08 +0000
From: "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
"Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH for v4.9 LTS 34/87] Btrfs: use down_read_nested to make
lockdep silent
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>
[ Upstream commit e321f8a801d7b4c40da8005257b05b9c2b51b072 ]
If @block_group is not @used_bg, it'll try to get @used_bg's lock without
droping @block_group 's lock and lockdep has throwed a scary deadlock warning
about it.
Fix it by using down_read_nested.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index e46e7fbe1b34..14a37ff0b9e3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -7401,7 +7401,8 @@ btrfs_lock_cluster(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
spin_unlock(&cluster->refill_lock);
- down_read(&used_bg->data_rwsem);
+ /* We should only have one-level nested. */
+ down_read_nested(&used_bg->data_rwsem, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
spin_lock(&cluster->refill_lock);
if (used_bg == cluster->block_group)
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists