[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+fX-E9ngW3MBhRFgpKBLzpyhR0TCx=ovosXOAqogzMMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 19:13:22 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: chosen property for kaslr-seed
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
> (+ Mark, Will, Catalin)
>
> On 15 July 2017 at 01:38, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> Document then /chosen/kaslr-seed property (and its interaction with the
>> EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL API).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> For the textual changes:
>
> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
>
> *However*, documenting the /chosen/kaslr-seed property promotes it
> from a stub<->kernel private interface to an external ABI between the
> kernel and the bootloader, and we need to reach agreement on whether
> doing so is desirable first IMHO.
>
Oh! I thought that was the point (having a bootloader provide kaslr
entropy). And that in the EFI case, it was the stub doing it.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists