lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:56:46 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...e.com>,
        "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 174/178] xen-blkback: don't leak stack data via
 response ring

3.16.46-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>

commit 089bc0143f489bd3a4578bdff5f4ca68fb26f341 upstream.

Rather than constructing a local structure instance on the stack, fill
the fields directly on the shared ring, just like other backends do.
Build on the fact that all response structure flavors are actually
identical (the old code did make this assumption too).

This is XSA-216.


Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h  | 25 +++++--------------------
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
@@ -1346,33 +1346,34 @@ static int dispatch_rw_block_io(struct x
 static void make_response(struct xen_blkif *blkif, u64 id,
 			  unsigned short op, int st)
 {
-	struct blkif_response  resp;
+	struct blkif_response *resp;
 	unsigned long     flags;
 	union blkif_back_rings *blk_rings = &blkif->blk_rings;
 	int notify;
 
-	resp.id        = id;
-	resp.operation = op;
-	resp.status    = st;
-
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&blkif->blk_ring_lock, flags);
 	/* Place on the response ring for the relevant domain. */
 	switch (blkif->blk_protocol) {
 	case BLKIF_PROTOCOL_NATIVE:
-		memcpy(RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->native, blk_rings->native.rsp_prod_pvt),
-		       &resp, sizeof(resp));
+		resp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->native,
+					 blk_rings->native.rsp_prod_pvt);
 		break;
 	case BLKIF_PROTOCOL_X86_32:
-		memcpy(RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->x86_32, blk_rings->x86_32.rsp_prod_pvt),
-		       &resp, sizeof(resp));
+		resp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->x86_32,
+					 blk_rings->x86_32.rsp_prod_pvt);
 		break;
 	case BLKIF_PROTOCOL_X86_64:
-		memcpy(RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->x86_64, blk_rings->x86_64.rsp_prod_pvt),
-		       &resp, sizeof(resp));
+		resp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->x86_64,
+					 blk_rings->x86_64.rsp_prod_pvt);
 		break;
 	default:
 		BUG();
 	}
+
+	resp->id        = id;
+	resp->operation = op;
+	resp->status    = st;
+
 	blk_rings->common.rsp_prod_pvt++;
 	RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&blk_rings->common, notify);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&blkif->blk_ring_lock, flags);
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h
@@ -70,9 +70,8 @@
 struct blkif_common_request {
 	char dummy;
 };
-struct blkif_common_response {
-	char dummy;
-};
+
+/* i386 protocol version */
 
 struct blkif_x86_32_request_rw {
 	uint8_t        nr_segments;  /* number of segments                   */
@@ -124,14 +123,6 @@ struct blkif_x86_32_request {
 	} u;
 } __attribute__((__packed__));
 
-/* i386 protocol version */
-#pragma pack(push, 4)
-struct blkif_x86_32_response {
-	uint64_t        id;              /* copied from request */
-	uint8_t         operation;       /* copied from request */
-	int16_t         status;          /* BLKIF_RSP_???       */
-};
-#pragma pack(pop)
 /* x86_64 protocol version */
 
 struct blkif_x86_64_request_rw {
@@ -188,18 +179,12 @@ struct blkif_x86_64_request {
 	} u;
 } __attribute__((__packed__));
 
-struct blkif_x86_64_response {
-	uint64_t       __attribute__((__aligned__(8))) id;
-	uint8_t         operation;       /* copied from request */
-	int16_t         status;          /* BLKIF_RSP_???       */
-};
-
 DEFINE_RING_TYPES(blkif_common, struct blkif_common_request,
-		  struct blkif_common_response);
+		  struct blkif_response);
 DEFINE_RING_TYPES(blkif_x86_32, struct blkif_x86_32_request,
-		  struct blkif_x86_32_response);
+		  struct blkif_response __packed);
 DEFINE_RING_TYPES(blkif_x86_64, struct blkif_x86_64_request,
-		  struct blkif_x86_64_response);
+		  struct blkif_response);
 
 union blkif_back_rings {
 	struct blkif_back_ring        native;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ