lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1500213398.828901265@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:56:38 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        "Steve Magnani" <steve.magnani@...idescorp.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "Bart Van Assche" <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 71/95] scsi: sd: Fix capacity calculation with 32-bit
 sector_t

3.2.91-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>

commit 7c856152cb92f8eee2df29ef325a1b1f43161aff upstream.

We previously made sure that the reported disk capacity was less than
0xffffffff blocks when the kernel was not compiled with large sector_t
support (CONFIG_LBDAF). However, this check assumed that the capacity
was reported in units of 512 bytes.

Add a sanity check function to ensure that we only enable disks if the
entire reported capacity can be expressed in terms of sector_t.

Reported-by: Steve Magnani <steve.magnani@...idescorp.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: use integer literal instead of U32_MAX]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/scsi/sd.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -1648,6 +1648,22 @@ static void read_capacity_error(struct s
 
 #define READ_CAPACITY_RETRIES_ON_RESET	10
 
+/*
+ * Ensure that we don't overflow sector_t when CONFIG_LBDAF is not set
+ * and the reported logical block size is bigger than 512 bytes. Note
+ * that last_sector is a u64 and therefore logical_to_sectors() is not
+ * applicable.
+ */
+static bool sd_addressable_capacity(u64 lba, unsigned int sector_size)
+{
+	u64 last_sector = (lba + 1ULL) << (ilog2(sector_size) - 9);
+
+	if (sizeof(sector_t) == 4 && last_sector > 0xffffffffULL)
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
 						unsigned char *buffer)
 {
@@ -1710,7 +1726,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_
 
 	sd_read_protection_type(sdkp, buffer);
 
-	if ((sizeof(sdkp->capacity) == 4) && (lba >= 0xffffffffULL)) {
+	if (!sd_addressable_capacity(lba, sector_size)) {
 		sd_printk(KERN_ERR, sdkp, "Too big for this kernel. Use a "
 			"kernel compiled with support for large block "
 			"devices.\n");
@@ -1796,7 +1812,7 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_
 		return sector_size;
 	}
 
-	if ((sizeof(sdkp->capacity) == 4) && (lba == 0xffffffff)) {
+	if (!sd_addressable_capacity(lba, sector_size)) {
 		sd_printk(KERN_ERR, sdkp, "Too big for this kernel. Use a "
 			"kernel compiled with support for large block "
 			"devices.\n");

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ