[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1500177424-13695-47-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 20:56:48 -0700
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bsingharora@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
linuxram@...ibm.com, arnd@...db.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com, mhocko@...nel.org
Subject: [RFC v6 46/62] selftest/vm: fix the wrong assert in pkey_disable_set()
If the flag is 0, no bits will be set. Hence we cant expect
the resulting bitmap to have a higher value than what it
was earlier.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
index e5f5535..b2d7879 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ void pkey_disable_set(int pkey, int flags)
dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_reg: 0x%lx\n",
__func__, pkey, rdpkey_reg());
if (flags)
- pkey_assert(rdpkey_reg() > orig_pkey_reg);
+ pkey_assert(rdpkey_reg() >= orig_pkey_reg);
dprintf1("END<---%s(%d, 0x%x)\n", __func__,
pkey, flags);
}
--
1.7.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists