| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1500177424-13695-63-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 20:57:04 -0700
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bsingharora@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
linuxram@...ibm.com, arnd@...db.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com, mhocko@...nel.org
Subject: [RFC v6 62/62] Documentation/vm: PowerPC specific updates to memory protection keys
Add documentation updates that capture PowerPC specific changes.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
---
Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt b/Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt
index b643045..9330105 100644
--- a/Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt
+++ b/Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt
@@ -1,22 +1,45 @@
-Memory Protection Keys for Userspace (PKU aka PKEYs) is a CPU feature
-which will be found on future Intel CPUs.
-
-Memory Protection Keys provides a mechanism for enforcing page-based
-protections, but without requiring modification of the page tables
-when an application changes protection domains. It works by
-dedicating 4 previously ignored bits in each page table entry to a
-"protection key", giving 16 possible keys.
-
-There is also a new user-accessible register (PKRU) with two separate
-bits (Access Disable and Write Disable) for each key. Being a CPU
-register, PKRU is inherently thread-local, potentially giving each
-thread a different set of protections from every other thread.
-
-There are two new instructions (RDPKRU/WRPKRU) for reading and writing
-to the new register. The feature is only available in 64-bit mode,
-even though there is theoretically space in the PAE PTEs. These
-permissions are enforced on data access only and have no effect on
-instruction fetches.
+Memory Protection Keys for Userspace (PKU aka PKEYs) is a CPU feature found on
+future Intel CPUs and on PowerPC 7 and higher CPUs.
+
+Memory Protection Keys provide a mechanism for enforcing page-based
+protections, but without requiring modification of the page tables when an
+application changes protection domains.
+
+It works by dedicating bits in each page table entry to a "protection key".
+There is also a user-accessible register with two separate bits for each
+key. Being a CPU register, the user-accessible register is inherently
+thread-local, potentially giving each thread a different set of protections
+from every other thread.
+
+On Intel:
+
+ Four previously bits are used the page table entry giving 16 possible keys.
+
+ The user accessible register(PKRU) has a bit each per key to disable
+ access and to disable write.
+
+ The feature is only available in 64-bit mode, even though there is
+ theoretically space in the PAE PTEs. These permissions are enforced on
+ data access only and have no effect on instruction fetches.
+
+On PowerPC:
+
+ Five bits in the page table entry are used giving 32 possible keys.
+ This support is currently for Hash Page Table mode only.
+
+ The user accessible register(AMR) has a bit each per key to disable
+ read and write. Access disable can be achieved by disabling
+ read and write.
+
+ 'mtspr 0xd, mem' reads the AMR register
+ 'mfspr mem, 0xd' writes into the AMR register.
+
+ Execution can be disabled by allocating a key with execute-disabled
+ permission. The execute-permissions on the key; however, cannot be
+ changed through a user accessible register. The CPU will not allow
+ execution of instruction in pages that are associated with
+ execute-disabled key.
+
=========================== Syscalls ===========================
@@ -28,9 +51,9 @@ There are 3 system calls which directly interact with pkeys:
unsigned long prot, int pkey);
Before a pkey can be used, it must first be allocated with
-pkey_alloc(). An application calls the WRPKRU instruction
+pkey_alloc(). An application calls the WRPKRU/AMR instruction
directly in order to change access permissions to memory covered
-with a key. In this example WRPKRU is wrapped by a C function
+with a key. In this example WRPKRU/AMR is wrapped by a C function
called pkey_set().
int real_prot = PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE;
@@ -52,11 +75,11 @@ is no longer in use:
munmap(ptr, PAGE_SIZE);
pkey_free(pkey);
-(Note: pkey_set() is a wrapper for the RDPKRU and WRPKRU instructions.
+(Note: pkey_set() is a wrapper for the RDPKRU,WRPKRU or AMR instructions.
An example implementation can be found in
- tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c)
+ tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c)
-=========================== Behavior ===========================
+=========================== Behavior =================================
The kernel attempts to make protection keys consistent with the
behavior of a plain mprotect(). For instance if you do this:
@@ -66,7 +89,7 @@ behavior of a plain mprotect(). For instance if you do this:
you can expect the same effects with protection keys when doing this:
- pkey = pkey_alloc(0, PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE | PKEY_DISABLE_READ);
+ pkey = pkey_alloc(0, PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS);
pkey_mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, pkey);
something(ptr);
@@ -83,3 +106,20 @@ with a read():
The kernel will send a SIGSEGV in both cases, but si_code will be set
to SEGV_PKERR when violating protection keys versus SEGV_ACCERR when
the plain mprotect() permissions are violated.
+
+
+====================================================================
+ Semantic differences
+
+The following semantic differences exist between x86 and power.
+
+a) powerpc *also* allows creation of a key with execute-disabled.
+ The following is allowed on powerpc.
+ pkey = pkey_alloc(0, PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE);
+
+b) changing the permission bits of a key from a signal handler does not
+ persist on x86. The PKRU specific fpregs entry needs to be modified
+ for it to persist. On powerpc the permission bits of the key can be
+ modified by programming the AMR register from the signal handler.
+ The changes persist across signal boundaries.
+=====================================================================
--
1.7.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists