linux-kernel - [RFC v6 21/62] powerpc: introduce execute-only pkey

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1500177424-13695-22-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Date:   Sat, 15 Jul 2017 20:56:23 -0700
From:   Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
To:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        bsingharora@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
        linuxram@...ibm.com, arnd@...db.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com, mhocko@...nel.org
Subject: [RFC v6 21/62] powerpc: introduce execute-only pkey

This patch provides the implementation of execute-only pkey.
The architecture-independent  expects the ability to create
and manage a special key which has execute-only permission.

Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h |    1 +
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h         |    8 ++++-
 arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c                  |   57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h
index 104ad72..0c0a2a8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/mmu.h
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct patb_entry {
 	 * bit unset -> key available for allocation
 	 */
 	u32 pkey_allocation_map;
+	s16 execute_only_pkey; /* key holding execute-only protection */
 #endif
 } mm_context_t;
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
index 0e744f1..1864148 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
@@ -118,11 +118,15 @@ static inline int mm_pkey_free(struct mm_struct *mm, int pkey)
  * Try to dedicate one of the protection keys to be used as an
  * execute-only protection key.
  */
+extern int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm);
 static inline int execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-	return 0;
+	if (!pkey_inited)
+		return -1;
+	return __execute_only_pkey(mm);
 }
 
+
 static inline int arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		int prot, int pkey)
 {
@@ -144,6 +148,8 @@ static inline void pkey_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	if (!pkey_inited)
 		return;
 	mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) = PKEY_INITIAL_ALLOCAION;
+	/* -1 means unallocated or invalid */
+	mm->context.execute_only_pkey = -1;
 }
 
 static inline void pkey_initialize(void)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
index b9ad98d..34e8557 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
@@ -97,3 +97,60 @@ int __arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
 	init_iamr(pkey, new_iamr_bits);
 	return 0;
 }
+
+static inline bool pkey_allows_readwrite(int pkey)
+{
+	int pkey_shift = pkeyshift(pkey);
+
+	if (!(read_uamor() & (0x3UL << pkey_shift)))
+		return true;
+
+	return !(read_amr() & ((AMR_RD_BIT|AMR_WR_BIT) << pkey_shift));
+}
+
+int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+	bool need_to_set_mm_pkey = false;
+	int execute_only_pkey = mm->context.execute_only_pkey;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Do we need to assign a pkey for mm's execute-only maps? */
+	if (execute_only_pkey == -1) {
+		/* Go allocate one to use, which might fail */
+		execute_only_pkey = mm_pkey_alloc(mm);
+		if (execute_only_pkey < 0)
+			return -1;
+		need_to_set_mm_pkey = true;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * We do not want to go through the relatively costly
+	 * dance to set AMR if we do not need to.  Check it
+	 * first and assume that if the execute-only pkey is
+	 * readwrite-disabled than we do not have to set it
+	 * ourselves.
+	 */
+	if (!need_to_set_mm_pkey &&
+	    !pkey_allows_readwrite(execute_only_pkey))
+		return execute_only_pkey;
+
+	/*
+	 * Set up AMR so that it denies access for everything
+	 * other than execution.
+	 */
+	ret = __arch_set_user_pkey_access(current, execute_only_pkey,
+			(PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE));
+	/*
+	 * If the AMR-set operation failed somehow, just return
+	 * 0 and effectively disable execute-only support.
+	 */
+	if (ret) {
+		mm_set_pkey_free(mm, execute_only_pkey);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	/* We got one, store it and use it from here on out */
+	if (need_to_set_mm_pkey)
+		mm->context.execute_only_pkey = execute_only_pkey;
+	return execute_only_pkey;
+}
-- 
1.7.1