linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] cpufreq: mediatek: Add support of cpufreq to MT2701/MT7623 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170717100550.29c6b3d3@endymion>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:05:50 +0200
From:   Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To:     Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
        <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <shunli.wang@...iatek.com>,
        <erin.lo@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] cpufreq: mediatek: Add support of cpufreq to
 MT2701/MT7623 SoC

On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:54:38 +0800, Eddie Huang wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 08:46 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > I am fine with both. Maybe don't resend for just that, mediatek
> > doesn't sound any bad.  
> 
> I am also fine with both. I think most people won't confuse about mtk
> and mediatek. I don't like send patches to just only change filenames
> and kconfig, especially kconfig modification will affect project
> defconfigs. My point is we shouldn't spend much time on this topic, and
> revisit filename when that driver need support new SoC, like this case.

I believe that being consistent is important, and I believe that
3-letter abbreviations are confusing. So in my ideal fantasy world, all
these drivers would be named *mediatek* and their config options would
be CONFIG_*MEDIATEK*. That being said, it's only my general opinion on
the topic. I'm not going to send any patch to rename any of these
drivers, as I have many tasks of higher priority on my own plate. And I
agree that renaming existing drivers does have a cost as well. So
whatever is decided is fine with me, really.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support