| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20170717093554.16459-1-dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:35:54 +0200
From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>, davem@...emloft.net,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk>,
Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] net/unix: drop obsolete fd-recursion limits
All unix sockets now account inflight FDs to the respective sender.
This was introduced in:
commit 712f4aad406bb1ed67f3f98d04c044191f0ff593
Author: willy tarreau <w@....eu>
Date: Sun Jan 10 07:54:56 2016 +0100
unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets
and further refined in:
commit 415e3d3e90ce9e18727e8843ae343eda5a58fad6
Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Date: Wed Feb 3 02:11:03 2016 +0100
unix: correctly track in-flight fds in sending process user_struct
Hence, regardless of the stacking depth of FDs, the total number of
inflight FDs is limited, and accounted. There is no known way for a
local user to exceed those limits or exploit the accounting.
Furthermore, the GC logic is independent of the recursion/stacking depth
as well. It solely depends on the total number of inflight FDs,
regardless of their layout.
Lastly, the current `recursion_level' suffers a TOCTOU race, since it
checks and inherits depths only at queue time. If we consider `A<-B' to
mean `queue-B-on-A', the following sequence circumvents the recursion
level easily:
A<-B
B<-C
C<-D
...
Y<-Z
resulting in:
A<-B<-C<-...<-Z
With all of this in mind, lets drop the recursion limit. It has no
additional security value, anymore. On the contrary, it randomly
confuses message brokers that try to forward file-descriptors, since
any sendmsg(2) call can fail spuriously with ETOOMANYREFS if a client
maliciously modifies the FD while inflight.
Cc: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@...labora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
---
include/net/af_unix.h | 1 -
net/unix/af_unix.c | 24 +-----------------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h
index 678e4d6fa317..3b3194b2fc65 100644
--- a/include/net/af_unix.h
+++ b/include/net/af_unix.h
@@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ struct unix_sock {
struct list_head link;
atomic_long_t inflight;
spinlock_t lock;
- unsigned char recursion_level;
unsigned long gc_flags;
#define UNIX_GC_CANDIDATE 0
#define UNIX_GC_MAYBE_CYCLE 1
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 7b52a380d710..5c53f22d62e8 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1528,26 +1528,13 @@ static inline bool too_many_unix_fds(struct task_struct *p)
return false;
}
-#define MAX_RECURSION_LEVEL 4
-
static int unix_attach_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
int i;
- unsigned char max_level = 0;
if (too_many_unix_fds(current))
return -ETOOMANYREFS;
- for (i = scm->fp->count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- struct sock *sk = unix_get_socket(scm->fp->fp[i]);
-
- if (sk)
- max_level = max(max_level,
- unix_sk(sk)->recursion_level);
- }
- if (unlikely(max_level > MAX_RECURSION_LEVEL))
- return -ETOOMANYREFS;
-
/*
* Need to duplicate file references for the sake of garbage
* collection. Otherwise a socket in the fps might become a
@@ -1559,7 +1546,7 @@ static int unix_attach_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
for (i = scm->fp->count - 1; i >= 0; i--)
unix_inflight(scm->fp->user, scm->fp->fp[i]);
- return max_level;
+ return 0;
}
static int unix_scm_to_skb(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb, bool send_fds)
@@ -1649,7 +1636,6 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
struct sk_buff *skb;
long timeo;
struct scm_cookie scm;
- int max_level;
int data_len = 0;
int sk_locked;
@@ -1701,7 +1687,6 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
err = unix_scm_to_skb(&scm, skb, true);
if (err < 0)
goto out_free;
- max_level = err + 1;
skb_put(skb, len - data_len);
skb->data_len = data_len;
@@ -1819,8 +1804,6 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
__net_timestamp(skb);
maybe_add_creds(skb, sock, other);
skb_queue_tail(&other->sk_receive_queue, skb);
- if (max_level > unix_sk(other)->recursion_level)
- unix_sk(other)->recursion_level = max_level;
unix_state_unlock(other);
other->sk_data_ready(other);
sock_put(other);
@@ -1855,7 +1838,6 @@ static int unix_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
int sent = 0;
struct scm_cookie scm;
bool fds_sent = false;
- int max_level;
int data_len;
wait_for_unix_gc();
@@ -1905,7 +1887,6 @@ static int unix_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
kfree_skb(skb);
goto out_err;
}
- max_level = err + 1;
fds_sent = true;
skb_put(skb, size - data_len);
@@ -1925,8 +1906,6 @@ static int unix_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
maybe_add_creds(skb, sock, other);
skb_queue_tail(&other->sk_receive_queue, skb);
- if (max_level > unix_sk(other)->recursion_level)
- unix_sk(other)->recursion_level = max_level;
unix_state_unlock(other);
other->sk_data_ready(other);
sent += size;
@@ -2324,7 +2303,6 @@ static int unix_stream_read_generic(struct unix_stream_read_state *state,
last_len = last ? last->len : 0;
again:
if (skb == NULL) {
- unix_sk(sk)->recursion_level = 0;
if (copied >= target)
goto unlock;
--
2.13.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists