[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170717131334.1761-1-palminha@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:13:34 +0100
From: Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>
To: <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
<Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com>
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll() static
Helper functions dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll don't need to be in global scope,
so make it static.
Cleans up sparse warnings:
- symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?
- symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Carlos Palminha <palminha@...opsys.com>
---
Patch made against linux-next tree, tag next-20170714
drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
index 0e03af279259..48d6d0712ea8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
}
-void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
+static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u32 size)
{
u32 retries, val;
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ib_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
}
-int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
+static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
u64 cpu_addr, enum dw_pcie_as_type as_type)
{
int type;
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists