lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP9C3Lh5k1g=Q-g4LJzjGFHg8mctftHVtt_65a5oPQC1Tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:08:23 +0200
From:   Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To:     Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc:     Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
        Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rbd: Fix uninitialized variable use in rbd_acquire_lock

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/7/14 18:06, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com> wrote:
>>> drivers/block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_acquire_lock':
>>> drivers/block/rbd.c:3602:44: error: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>>>
>>> Silence the warning, found it when built old kernel(3.10) with
>>> OBS(opensuse build service).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>> index b008b6a..b640ad8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>> @@ -3435,7 +3435,7 @@ static void rbd_acquire_lock(struct work_struct *work)
>>>         struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
>>>                                             struct rbd_device, lock_dwork);
>>>         enum rbd_lock_state lock_state;
>>> -       int ret;
>>> +       int ret = 0;
>>>
>>>         dout("%s rbd_dev %p\n", __func__, rbd_dev);
>>>  again:
>>
>> How did you get rbd_acquire_lock() into 3.10?
>
> Using CentOS 7.3.

Applied.

Thanks,

                Ilya

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ