[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B6FF265B9@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:51:22 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-audit@...hat.com" <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"lizefan@...wei.com" <lizefan@...wei.com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"eparis@...hat.com" <eparis@...hat.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 14/15] kernel: convert futex_pi_state.refcount from
atomic_t to refcount_t
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>
> > Subject: kernel: convert futex_pi_state.refcount from atomic_t to refcount_t
>
> Several people including myself told you already, that subjects consist of
>
> SUBSYSTEMPREFIX: Concise description
>
> It's easy enough to figure the prefix out by looking at the output of 'git
> log path/of/changed/file'.
Ok, I will try this from now on. I didn't think of it, but was trying to figure it
based on general location and meaning (obviously wrong).
>
> Concise descriptions are not lengthy sentences with implementation
> details. They should merily describe the problem/concept of change. The
> details go into the changelog. IOW, something like:
>
> "PROPERPREFIX: Convert to refcount API"
>
> would be sufficient.
OK, will fix.
>
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> > situations.
>
> Copying the same sentence over and over avoids thinking about a proper
> changelog, right? You fail to explain, how you come to the conclusion that
> futex_pi_state.refcount is a pure reference counter (aside of the name) and
> therefor can be safely converted to refcount_t.
OK, this is not very useful for many cases. Yes, I am using automated log on
these patches, because I used to have 240 of them and writing manual logs for them
would be fun. Moreover, in many cases, writing manual logs don't bring any value since
I would have to repeat the same things all over again: xyz conversions was found by using *.cocci
pattern first, then looked at manually and it looked like a standard reference counter that
frees the things after calling refcount_dec_and_test() (or its variation with lock which is rare).
Other things also looked correct, like I didn't see increments from zero, counter starts at 1 etc.
I would really have to repeat the same thing in each changelog. Does it really bring value?
Best Regards,
Elena.
>
> Other than that, the patch itself is fine.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists