linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Staging: Lustre Fix block statement style issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170717182143.6xns7ncwdn2wqxyf@mwanda>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jul 2017 21:21:43 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org" <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Staging: Lustre Fix block statement style issue

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:50:27PM +0000, Craig Inches wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:44:59PM +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> > On Jul 12, 2017, at 03:03, Craig Inches <craig@...iginches.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > This fixes a block statement which didnt end with */
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <Craig@...iginches.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > > index dd5bc0e46560..a1ae66ede7a8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > > @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ struct ksock_msg {
> > > 	__u64	ksm_zc_cookies[2];	/* Zero-Copy request/ACK cookie */
> > > 	union {
> > > 		struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, it's empty if
> > > -					  * it's NOOP */
> > > +						* it's NOOP
> > > +						*/
> > 
> > Rather than making the multi-line comments even more space consuming (I'm not a big
> > fan of "*/ must be on a line by itself" since it wastes a lot of vertical space),
> > I'd prefer to just shorten the comment, if possible, like:
> > 
> > 		struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, empty if NOOP */
> 
> That makes sense, I believe the series has already made it to
> staging-next, so not sure what the process would be to fix it up.

staging-next can't be rebased (barring something very drastic).  Send a
new patch based on what's been committed.

regards,
dan carpenter