[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170717201631.GA13024@amd>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:16:32 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@...madesigns.com>,
JB <jb_lescher@...madesigns.com>, Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PM / suspend: Add suspend_target_state()
Hi!
> Have the core suspend/resume framework store the system-wide suspend
> state (suspend_state_t) we are about to enter, and expose it to drivers
> via suspend_target_state() in order to retrieve that. The state is
> assigned in suspend_devices_and_enter().
Do we really want to have variable + inline functions that just read
that variable?
> +static inline suspend_state_t suspend_target_state(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
I'm pretty sure -ENOSYS is not compatible with suspend_state_t ...
> diff --git a/kernel/power/suspend.c b/kernel/power/suspend.c
> index 3ecf275d7e44..a296d6e25d52 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/suspend.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/suspend.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ const char *mem_sleep_states[PM_SUSPEND_MAX];
>
> suspend_state_t mem_sleep_current = PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE;
> static suspend_state_t mem_sleep_default = PM_SUSPEND_MEM;
> +static suspend_state_t pm_suspend_target_state;
Is there disadvantage of just having this variable non-static?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists