[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170717.134549.2101398770863549187.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 13:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/12] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add Energy Detect
ops
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:32:52 -0400
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:
>
>> I never liked this. I think it is architecturally wrong for the switch
>> to be poking around in the PHY. It should ask the PHY driver. This is
>> especially true for external PHYs which might not be a Marvell PHY.
>
> I share the same concern. However this patch is just isolating the
> existing code so that we get rid of the last caps and flags and stop
> writing (without reading them first) arbitrary registers.
>
> Once this portion is moved to the PHY driver, one can remove it from
> mv88e6xxx.
Seems a reasonable plan of action.
Andrew, do you agree?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists