[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3rc-7mXsPosXG7jWBDf9D31816eRpTP266cC94B5jfWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:23:11 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
IDE-ML <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] [media] fix warning on v4l2_subdev_call() result
interpreted as bool
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> wrote:
> On 17/07/17 16:26, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Let me try again without ccache for now and see what warnings remain.
>> We can find a solution for those first, and then decide how to deal with
>> ccache.
>
> Sounds good.
>
> I'm OK with applying this if there is no other way to prevent these warnings.
Small update: I noticed that having ccache being the default compiler
even with CCACHE_DISABLE=1 causes a lot of these warnings. Completely
taking ccache out of the picture however seems to have eliminated the
warnings about v4l2_subdev_call() and other silly warnings, but not
the interesting ones in the -Wint-in-bool-context category.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists