[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170718000018.GD14983@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:00:18 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
aarcange@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm:hugetlb: Define system call hugetlb size
encodings in single file
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:27:59PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> +#define HUGETLB_FLAG_ENCODE_512KB (19 << MAP_HUGE_SHIFT
> +#define HUGETLB_FLAG_ENCODE_1MB (20 << MAP_HUGE_SHIFT)
> +#define HUGETLB_FLAG_ENCODE_2MB (21 << MAP_HUGE_SHIFT)
> +#define HUGETLB_FLAG_ENCODE_8MB (23 << MAP_HUGE_SHIFT)
> +#define HUGETLB_FLAG_ENCODE_16MB (24 << MAP_HUGE_SHIFT)
> +#define HUGETLB_FLAG_ENCODE_1GB (30 << MAP_HUGE_SHIFT)
> +#define HUGETLB_FLAG_ENCODE__16GB (34 << MAP_HUGE_SHIFT)
The __ seems like a mistake?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists