linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170718184135.auf6d2clsdxseka3@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2017 20:41:35 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        longman@...hat.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com,
        luto@...capital.net, efault@....de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        guro@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread support

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:54:56PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:

> Okay, we're kinda off the rails now.  Just to verify that we're on the
> same page, are you also saying that the following should be a valid
> configuration?
> 
> 	R (D)
>         |
> 	A (D and has processes in it and controllers enabled)
>         |
>         C (D and has processes in it) 
> 

Argh, the no internal process thing again -- I completely forgot about
that :-(