[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20f6a994-26b4-578c-d641-395639ebac0f@mleia.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:48:21 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
To: gabriel.fernandez@...com,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
daniel.thompson@...aro.org, andrea.merello@...il.com,
radoslaw.pietrzyk@...il.com, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
ludovic.barre@...com, olivier.bideau@...com,
amelie.delaunay@...com, gabriel.fernandez.st@...il.com,
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] clk: nxp: clk-lpc32xx: rename
clk_gate_is_enabled()
Hello Gabriel,
On 07/18/2017 10:53 AM, gabriel.fernandez@...com wrote:
> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
>
> We need to export clk_gate_is_enabled() from clk framework, then
first of all let's clarify if you really need to export clk_gate_is_enabled()
from the CCF.
> to avoid compilation issue we have to rename clk_gate_is_enabled()
> in NXP LPC32xx clock driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/nxp/clk-lpc32xx.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/nxp/clk-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/clk/nxp/clk-lpc32xx.c
> index 5b98ff9..1cc71ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/nxp/clk-lpc32xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/nxp/clk-lpc32xx.c
> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static void clk_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> regmap_update_bits(clk_regmap, clk->reg, mask, val);
> }
>
> -static int clk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +static int __clk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> {
> struct lpc32xx_clk_gate *clk = to_lpc32xx_gate(hw);
> u32 val;
> @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ static int clk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> static const struct clk_ops lpc32xx_clk_gate_ops = {
> .enable = clk_gate_enable,
> .disable = clk_gate_disable,
> - .is_enabled = clk_gate_is_enabled,
> + .is_enabled = __clk_gate_is_enabled,
In case if this change gets continuation, here I want to see the same
prefixes for all functions and no underscores, namely it shall be
* lpc32xx_clk_gate_enable(),
* lpc32xx_clk_gate_disable(),
* lpc32xx_clk_gate_is_enabled().
> };
>
> #define div_mask(width) ((1 << (width)) - 1)
>
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists