linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 05/15] smack: Refactor to remove bprm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1500416736-49829-6-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:25:26 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/15] smack: Refactor to remove bprm_secureexec hook

The Smack bprm_secureexec hook can be merged with the bprm_set_creds
hook since it's dealing with the same information, and all of the details
are finalized during the first call to the bprm_set_creds hook via
prepare_binprm() (subsequent calls due to binfmt_script, etc, are ignored
via bprm->called_set_creds).

Here, the test can just happen at the end of the bprm_set_creds hook,
and the bprm_secureexec hook can be dropped.

Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
 security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 21 ++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 7d4b2e221124..4f1967be3d20 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -950,6 +950,10 @@ static int smack_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	bsp->smk_task = isp->smk_task;
 	bprm->per_clear |= PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID;
 
+	/* Decide if this is a secure exec. */
+	if (bsp->smk_task != bsp->smk_forked)
+		bprm->secureexec = 1;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -967,22 +971,6 @@ static void smack_bprm_committing_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 		current->pdeath_signal = 0;
 }
 
-/**
- * smack_bprm_secureexec - Return the decision to use secureexec.
- * @bprm: binprm for exec
- *
- * Returns 0 on success.
- */
-static int smack_bprm_secureexec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
-{
-	struct task_smack *tsp = current_security();
-
-	if (tsp->smk_task != tsp->smk_forked)
-		return 1;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * Inode hooks
  */
@@ -4646,7 +4634,6 @@ static struct security_hook_list smack_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_set_creds, smack_bprm_set_creds),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_committing_creds, smack_bprm_committing_creds),
-	LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_secureexec, smack_bprm_secureexec),
 
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_alloc_security, smack_inode_alloc_security),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_free_security, smack_inode_free_security),
-- 
2.7.4