linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/57] 4.4.77-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:56:22 -0700
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
        patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, info@...nelci.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/57] 4.4.77-stable review

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:21:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 02:07:45PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>>> >> stable-rc/linux-4.4.y boot: 99 boots: 1 failed, 92 passed with 5 offline, 1 conflict (v4.4.76-58-g1a12e8e8a429)
>>> >
>>> > Any idea how 0-day and Guenter's system found problems with this
>>> > release, but you all didn't?  Do you not have any SH systems in
>>> > kernelci?
>>>
>>> kernelci does not do any SH builds, but it did catch this driver in
>>> the allmodconfig
>>> builds and a couple of ARM builds that use the same one, see the mail with
>>> subject "stable-rc/linux-4.4.y build: 199 builds: 10 failed, 189
>>> passed, 30 errors,
>>> 4 warnings (v4.4.76-58-g1a12e8e8a429)":
>>>
>>> Errors summary:
>>>
>>>      10  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7791.c:1096:2: error: implicit
>>> declaration of function 'PINMUX_IPSR_GPSR'
>>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>      10  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7791.c:1096:28: error:
>>> 'DVC_MUTE' undeclared here (not in a function)
>>>      10  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7791.c:1096:19: error:
>>> 'IP6_2_0' undeclared here (not in a function)
>>
>> Where is that email?  I never got that, I only got this email
>> response...
>
> Indeed, I see now that for some reason, only the stable/{3.16,3.18,4.4,4.9}
> build results get sent to the mailing list by kernelci, while the stable-rc
> builds only get sent to a short list of individuals that I happen to be
> on. I never noticed this before as I sort them in my inbox according to the
> sender address rather than the mailing list.
>
> Clearly those build reports should include either you or the mailing list.

I've added stable-rc to the trees that go to the public lists.

> I also see that there are no builds for stable/{4.1,4.11,4.12} and
> stable-rc/4.1. This is apparently a result of the kernelci build bot
> intentionally only checking specific branches, while some of the
> other bots simply build all branches on the trees they watch.

v4.11 and v4.12 were added recently, and you've probably noticed they've
started showing up now, both for stable and stable-rc.

Kevin