| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <150042040756.20736.13537770572336560890.stgit@noble>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:26:47 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove 'flags' arg from
ldlm_process_flock_lock()
This is only ever set to LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC, so we can remove the arg
and discard any code that is only run when it doesn't have that value.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c | 110 ++++-------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
index fbb627a2f6c1..b6d5a83e61cd 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ ldlm_flock_destroy(struct ldlm_lock *lock, enum ldlm_mode mode, __u64 flags)
* is released.
*
*/
-static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req, __u64 *flags)
+static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req)
{
struct ldlm_resource *res = req->l_resource;
struct ldlm_namespace *ns = ldlm_res_to_ns(res);
@@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req, __u64 *flags)
const struct ldlm_callback_suite null_cbs = { };
CDEBUG(D_DLMTRACE,
- "flags %#llx owner %llu pid %u mode %u start %llu end %llu\n",
- *flags, new->l_policy_data.l_flock.owner,
+ "owner %llu pid %u mode %u start %llu end %llu\n",
+ new->l_policy_data.l_flock.owner,
new->l_policy_data.l_flock.pid, mode,
req->l_policy_data.l_flock.start,
req->l_policy_data.l_flock.end);
@@ -150,74 +150,16 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req, __u64 *flags)
req->l_blocking_ast = NULL;
reprocess:
- if ((*flags == LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC) || (mode == LCK_NL)) {
- /* This loop determines where this processes locks start
- * in the resource lr_granted list.
- */
- list_for_each(tmp, &res->lr_granted) {
- lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock,
- l_res_link);
- if (ldlm_same_flock_owner(lock, req)) {
- ownlocks = tmp;
- break;
- }
- }
- } else {
- int reprocess_failed = 0;
-
- lockmode_verify(mode);
-
- /* This loop determines if there are existing locks
- * that conflict with the new lock request.
- */
- list_for_each(tmp, &res->lr_granted) {
- lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock,
- l_res_link);
-
- if (ldlm_same_flock_owner(lock, req)) {
- if (!ownlocks)
- ownlocks = tmp;
- continue;
- }
-
- /* locks are compatible, overlap doesn't matter */
- if (lockmode_compat(lock->l_granted_mode, mode))
- continue;
-
- if (!ldlm_flocks_overlap(lock, req))
- continue;
-
- if (*flags & LDLM_FL_BLOCK_NOWAIT) {
- ldlm_flock_destroy(req, mode, *flags);
- return LDLM_ITER_STOP;
- }
-
- if (*flags & LDLM_FL_TEST_LOCK) {
- ldlm_flock_destroy(req, mode, *flags);
- req->l_req_mode = lock->l_granted_mode;
- req->l_policy_data.l_flock.pid =
- lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.pid;
- req->l_policy_data.l_flock.start =
- lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start;
- req->l_policy_data.l_flock.end =
- lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.end;
- *flags |= LDLM_FL_LOCK_CHANGED;
- return LDLM_ITER_STOP;
- }
-
- ldlm_resource_add_lock(res, &res->lr_waiting, req);
- *flags |= LDLM_FL_BLOCK_GRANTED;
- return LDLM_ITER_STOP;
+ /* This loop determines where this processes locks start
+ * in the resource lr_granted list.
+ */
+ list_for_each(tmp, &res->lr_granted) {
+ lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock,
+ l_res_link);
+ if (ldlm_same_flock_owner(lock, req)) {
+ ownlocks = tmp;
+ break;
}
- if (reprocess_failed)
- return LDLM_ITER_CONTINUE;
- }
-
- if (*flags & LDLM_FL_TEST_LOCK) {
- ldlm_flock_destroy(req, mode, *flags);
- req->l_req_mode = LCK_NL;
- *flags |= LDLM_FL_LOCK_CHANGED;
- return LDLM_ITER_STOP;
}
/* Scan the locks owned by this process that overlap this request.
@@ -267,7 +209,8 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req, __u64 *flags)
}
if (added) {
- ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, mode, *flags);
+ ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, mode,
+ LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC);
} else {
new = lock;
added = 1;
@@ -293,7 +236,8 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req, __u64 *flags)
new->l_policy_data.l_flock.end + 1;
break;
}
- ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, lock->l_req_mode, *flags);
+ ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, lock->l_req_mode,
+ LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC);
continue;
}
if (new->l_policy_data.l_flock.end >=
@@ -325,7 +269,7 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req, __u64 *flags)
lock_res_and_lock(req);
if (IS_ERR(new2)) {
ldlm_flock_destroy(req, lock->l_granted_mode,
- *flags);
+ LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC);
return LDLM_ITER_STOP;
}
goto reprocess;
@@ -354,9 +298,8 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req, __u64 *flags)
&new2->l_remote_handle,
&new2->l_exp_hash);
}
- if (*flags == LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC)
- ldlm_lock_addref_internal_nolock(new2,
- lock->l_granted_mode);
+ ldlm_lock_addref_internal_nolock(new2,
+ lock->l_granted_mode);
/* insert new2 at lock */
ldlm_resource_add_lock(res, ownlocks, new2);
@@ -377,22 +320,13 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req, __u64 *flags)
ldlm_resource_add_lock(res, ownlocks, req);
}
- if (*flags != LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC) {
- /* The only one possible case for client-side calls flock
- * policy function is ldlm_flock_completion_ast inside which
- * carries LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC flag.
- */
- CERROR("Illegal parameter for client-side-only module.\n");
- LBUG();
- }
-
/* In case we're reprocessing the requested lock we can't destroy
* it until after calling ldlm_add_ast_work_item() above so that laawi()
* can bump the reference count on \a req. Otherwise \a req
* could be freed before the completion AST can be sent.
*/
if (added)
- ldlm_flock_destroy(req, mode, *flags);
+ ldlm_flock_destroy(req, mode, LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC);
ldlm_resource_dump(D_INFO, res);
return LDLM_ITER_CONTINUE;
@@ -582,12 +516,10 @@ ldlm_flock_completion_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 flags, void *data)
getlk->fl_start = (loff_t)lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start;
getlk->fl_end = (loff_t)lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.end;
} else {
- __u64 noreproc = LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC;
-
/* We need to reprocess the lock to do merges or splits
* with existing locks owned by this process.
*/
- ldlm_process_flock_lock(lock, &noreproc);
+ ldlm_process_flock_lock(lock);
}
unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
return rc;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists