linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170718102339.28726-3-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:23:37 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] i2c: add docs to clarify DMA handling

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
---
Changes since v2:

* documentation updates. Hopefully better wording now

 Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations

diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations b/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..e46c24d65c8556
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/i2c/DMA-considerations
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+Linux I2C and DMA
+-----------------
+
+Given that I2C is a low-speed bus where largely small messages are transferred,
+it is not considered a prime user of DMA access. At this time of writing, only
+10% of I2C bus master drivers have DMA support implemented. And the vast
+majority of transactions are so small that setting up DMA for it will likely
+add more overhead than a plain PIO transfer.
+
+Therefore, it is *not* mandatory that the buffer of an I2C message is DMA safe.
+It does not seem reasonable to apply additional burdens when the feature is so
+rarely used. However, it is recommended to use a DMA-safe buffer if your
+message size is likely applicable for DMA. Most drivers have this threshold
+around 8 bytes. As of today, this is mostly an educated guess, however.
+
+To support this scenario, drivers wishing to implement DMA can use helper
+functions from the I2C core. One checks if a message is DMA capable in terms of
+size and memory type. It can optionally also create a bounce buffer:
+
+	i2c_check_msg_for_dma(msg, threshold, &bounce_buf);
+
+The bounce buffer handling from the core is generic and simple. It will always
+allocate a new bounce buffer. If you want a more sophisticated handling (e.g.
+reusing pre-allocated buffers), you can leave the pointer to the bounce buffer
+empty and implement your own handling based on the return value of the above
+function.
+
+The other helper function releases the bounce buffer. It ensures data is copied
+back to the message:
+
+	i2c_release_dma_bounce_buf(msg, bounce_buf);
+
+Please check the in-kernel documentation for details. The i2c-sh_mobile driver
+can be used as a reference example.
+
+If you plan to use DMA with I2C (or with any other bus, actually) make sure you
+have CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG enabled during development. It can help you find
+various issues which can be complex to debug otherwise.
-- 
2.11.0