[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-b0529becebde629ff6abf2afdca6def6824f4fa9@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:41:43 -0700
From: tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: efault@....de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, luto@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
jslaby@...e.cz, hpa@...or.com, brgerst@...il.com, bp@...en8.de
Subject: [tip:x86/asm] x86/dumpstack: Fix occasionally missing registers
Commit-ID: b0529becebde629ff6abf2afdca6def6824f4fa9
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b0529becebde629ff6abf2afdca6def6824f4fa9
Author: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:33:40 -0500
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:56:23 +0200
x86/dumpstack: Fix occasionally missing registers
If two consecutive stack frames have pt_regs, the oops dump code fails
to print the second frame's registers. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 3b3fa11bc700 ("x86/dumpstack: Print any pt_regs found on the stack")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/269c5c00c7d45c699f3dcea42a3a594c6cf7a9a3.1499786555.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index dbce3cc..bd265a4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
if (stack_name)
printk("%s <%s>\n", log_lvl, stack_name);
+ if (regs && on_stack(&stack_info, regs, sizeof(*regs)))
+ __show_regs(regs, 0);
+
/*
* Scan the stack, printing any text addresses we find. At the
* same time, follow proper stack frames with the unwinder.
@@ -118,10 +121,8 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
* Don't print regs->ip again if it was already printed
* by __show_regs() below.
*/
- if (regs && stack == ®s->ip) {
- unwind_next_frame(&state);
- continue;
- }
+ if (regs && stack == ®s->ip)
+ goto next;
if (stack == ret_addr_p)
reliable = 1;
@@ -144,6 +145,7 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
if (!reliable)
continue;
+next:
/*
* Get the next frame from the unwinder. No need to
* check for an error: if anything goes wrong, the rest
@@ -153,7 +155,7 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
/* if the frame has entry regs, print them */
regs = unwind_get_entry_regs(&state);
- if (regs)
+ if (regs && on_stack(&stack_info, regs, sizeof(*regs)))
__show_regs(regs, 0);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists