[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170718110433.GK29638@localhost>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:04:33 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: karthik@...hveda.org
Cc: pure.logic@...us-software.ie, johan@...nel.org, elder@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sunil.m@...hveda.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: loopback: Enclose multiple macro
statements in do-while loop
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:26:40PM +0530, karthik@...hveda.org wrote:
> From: Karthik Tummala <karthik@...hveda.org>
>
> Enclosed multiple macro statements in a do - while loop as per kernel
> coding standard, pointed by checkpatch.
\
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name##_avg)
>
> -#define gb_loopback_stats_attrs(field) \
> - gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u); \
> - gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u); \
> - gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field)
> +#define gb_loopback_stats_attrs(field) \
> +do { \
> + gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u); \
> + gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u); \
> + gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field); \
> +} while (0)
You obviously did not even compile-test this before submitting it, which
needless to say, is not ok.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists